NFL Losing it Audience

Recent, articles about the NFL losing audience is rather interesting in that the NFL seems to be clueless about the core reasons and why people watch football.  What interests the fans is the game, the battle on the field. http://tiny.cc/w1mery

What the audience is annoyed at is the political view of the players. It is about the game.  The audience wants entertainment.  The don’t want a political statement, listening to the transgressions of the players off the field, the terrible personal judgements the players make, the obscene amount of money the players get paid for playing a game.

In this time, of divisiveness in the political arena, the less that stellar moral character of the political leaders, the outrageous and blinding lust for power over right action, the American public wants entertainment to be just that.  The political view are personal matters.

What does a 24 year old making millions know about the world, working hard to feed a family, hold down a job, paying bills, getting out of debt, paying taxes.  Every bump and bruise is examined in the media as if it where a life threatening ailment.

The media is desperate for stories to capture an audience.  The lust for a story outweighs the facts and it’s relative importance. If the NFL wants it audience back, focus on the game, the strategy, the players skill, the matchups.

Yes, the photo of the ballplayer with his scantily clad wife/girl friend in a compromising situation gets attention, momentarily, it minimizes the value of the player’s perception in the eyes of the audience.

If we want to improve the narrative of the players, lets focus on their contributions off the field.  Heroes visiting the hospitals, cheering up the sick, visiting schools and talking about contribution and leading by example.  Whereas it may not be sexy to visit a high school and explain how to cover a receiver. For lives it does touch is  experience is uplifting, long lasting and deeply meaningful.

 

Lastly, we can’t lose sight of the fact, that the players live in the United States, a country that is giving them the opportunity to reap the benefits of their inherit athletic gifts.  The players own the country far more than than the courtesy of standing for the national anthem.  For the privilege of playing in the NFL they ought to feel the obligation to give back.

If there is a need to make a political statement may it be with the foresight to lead by example, clear in its purpose and not offend the sport, the country and the people that give them the opportunity.

#NFL #Standing for the National Anthem #NFL TV Ratings #NFL Player Association #Do the Right Thing.

Cost of Being Free

What is the cost?  Clearly we have spent billions to make our country secure. It is time to ask some fundamental questions.

What do we want our country to be?

A quasi-militarized state where suspicion is a norm?

Where the battlefield is in our backyard? Is there a political purpose?

Do we want to live with the mindset of scarcity?

Do we want energy to continue to get a larger share of our personal budgets?

More importantly, what do we want for our future?

The time to dream is now. Dream of an abundant future. Dream of a future filled with opportunity, where problems are addressed with the best minds and swept out of the way to make room for higher callings.

This country was founded on principals of liberty and the abolishment of tyranny.  Our Declaration of Independence clearly stated the principle of our founding. If there were a time to review our founding document the time is now.

We need to envision a boundless future, instead of the political, racial, religious squabbling that has cloud our vision for the past 6 or 7 years.  We must demand an abundant future and seek leadership based on experience, not pandering promises.

 

Living Within One’s Means

How long can you survive borrowing from the future?  The founders of this country knew of the dangers of debt and the servitude and the shackles for which we hobble the future.

A farmer fully understands, that if he sells all his seeds he has nothing to plant the next year.

(For those of you who know that currently there are provisions in the contract with seed company’s that restrict the use of reseeding from existing crops, sorry for the example, but the metaphor is: you can’t borrow from the future without consequences.)

Maybe a better analogy is going to the gas station, if you only have $20 and fill the tank, you’d be indebted $60. You better have a great relationship with the gas station.

We desperately need a dose of common sense for decision-making. I remember the summary of Obama’s Obama Care Program.  We will add 30 million people to the healthcare umbrella and it won’t cost anyone any more.

The logic does not work and the politicians can’t explain it.

Politicians are in the business of staying elected. Term limits gives us the opportunity to see fresh faces and maybe the end of the elected officials career path.

We need the people we elect to have experience at running something were we do not provide on-the-job-training.

If you want to be a leader, prove you are worthy. Get a job, create value, create jobs, learn leadership, be in a position to give back. The job of the public official should be to provide the leadership and experience.

How can a job in the public sector, with job security, standardized pay raises based on longevity, not performance measures receive higher pay than a comparable job in the private sector. This is crazy.

We are creating life jobs that only do one thing; reduce the “unemployment figures” while increasing the cost to the taxpayer.

What does the government produce? More regulation, more bureaucracy, more Administrative agencies.

Let’s go back to the founding documents to determine what the government is supposed to do:

If there is a problem to be remedied, how about an committee to determine the solution, who’s purpose is to set forth a framework for accomplishing the solution, then the committee disbands. The solution if need be, establishes an administrative body; created to solve the problem.

Built into the administrative body is a series of milestones to determine the state of progress and once the task is complete the administrative body disbands.

Before, I close this missive, I do not intend to dismiss the value of our military, our court system, our police or firefighters, our teachers and the support staff necessary to maintain our country as a country ruled by law.

The role of government is clearly mapped our in our constitution, the expansion of which undermines the very beauty of the United States.

Our Country’s Obsession

We are in trouble when the head of state brags about killing someone. This is no longer a political issue.

Killing Osama Ben Laden, has been an obsession of our government since September 11, 2001. I have no issue with this obsession; our country has been violated, fundamentally and profoundly. Our government has take this violation and converted it to a security obsession that has no boundaries, crossing the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, personal dignity and geopolitical sovereignty.

Osama Ben Laden is dead. No politician should or can take credit for this act.  The US Military has done their job, eliminated a threat. Can we move on?

From a political standpoint, having a threat serves a useful purpose, it focuses our collective attention to an outside problem, away from the domestic issues that are affecting all Americans. Issue’s like unemployment, run away cost of health care, low or no-growth in our economy, galloping governmental mismanagement of the economy and the acceptance of high risk decision making with little concern about the ramifications of failure.

The way our government deals with a problem is rather simple:

  1. We identify some symptom that we don’t like
  2. We create some regulation
  3. Set up a institution to remedy the “problem”
  4. Never look back

Funding is set, and overtime the institution grows and takes a life of its own.

This is not what the United States is about. Our government officials both elected and appointed have it all wrong. The government is obsessed with looking like it is doing something to justify it existence. Rather than ask the question over and over again, “Is what we are doing working” and “have we achieved the objective?” The government tries to look like is doing something and justifies its actions without an objective criteria for success.

For this reason, we have created some seriously flawed institutions.