August to Remember

An August to Remember

It is an interesting time to be in the Northeast of the United States.

I like summer and I really like August. There is a lazy feel to August. The heat of summer, the fresh farmers market fruit, getting together with friends and squeezing out the last bit of every warm sunny day. There is a relaxed attitude towards work- resting now, knowing fall is coming. The children talk about going back to school and grading up.

This year was not different except two thing happened that were unique.  Number one was the earthquake. http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2011-08-23/Earthquake-rocks-East-Coast/50107542/1(http://img.ibtimes.com/www/articles/20110901/207114_aftershock-virginia-earthquake-3-4-magnitude-mineral-louisa-county.htm) A 5.9 tremor with shock waves up and down the East Coast.  An earthquake in the Northeast is a big deal. It is not like the West coast, where a quake unless really big, is a normal event, similar to traffic on the LA freeways.

There wasn’t any big fallout, or structural damage like the offshore Japanese Quake but what it did do was remind us that we were vulnerable. Things can happen when we are not prepared.

A week later a hurricane formed in the eastern Atlantic and took a track up the coast producing wind, rain and flooding. Prepare for the worst case, if nothing happens at least you were prepared. If something does happen, prepared you are. But what happens if the worse case is worse that you planned? Then what?

To a certain extent, worse than you planned was what the Northeast received.

What a great lesson in planning and leadership. My litmus test is simple; does it work? Crises and decisions in crises tell a lot about people and our leaders. From these events, I look for successes and failures. A crisis presents the perfect opportunity to see who the Politicians really are. Are they leaders or slaves? I’m sorry to use the work slave maybe that is rather strong but it is better than the other word: reactionary. My definition of reactionary is a person that responds to events after the fact with an air of learned critic. Too bad the words slave is after the fact.

Anyone can be a critic.

Well, what did we learn from our Politicians?

Obama went on vacation but cut it short, because of the potential that the storm would hit Martha’s Vineyard. He was detached, on vacation. And what did he do when he came back? He got on a bus and started campaigning. After Labor Day his big pronouncement was a speech on the economy and jobs.

I call this the vacation high; it’s a feeling of lightness and clarity. When I get back from vacation, and all the other politicians get back from vacation, we’ve got refreshed ideas and want to share it with everyone. This should fix everything.

But what about now!?! What about all the Americans that cannot take vacation or are on a forced vacation because they are unemployed? I’m sorry there is no urgency for the President to act. Ask the unemployed if there is a need for urgent action. No doubt they understand that the presidency is a tough job, and the president needs a vacation. At the same time ask them if they could start a job on Saturday morning, my guess is they would be dressed ready to work within minutes, not saying, “great, thanks, I’ll start on Monday.”

Personally I fearful what the president is cooking up to rescue us from his failed economic policies of his administration.

I really don’t what to hear, “he inherited the problems, or the congress this or that”. Or worse, that he has a new stimulus package that adds more liquidity to the market. Excuse me but what market needs is liquidity.

A captain of ship knows if they are going in the wrong direction it is appropriate to change direction. But not this one, so far, the plan is stay the course and everything will turnout all right. Trust him.

In New York, there is a media mogul who as taken some time off from his formidable empire to do some community service. He takes $1 in salary and kicks in his own money to supplement his municipal budgets. Facing a potential catastrophic hurricane he took action. He went on the TV and radio, explained his concerns about the hurricane, referring to his experts advice, he planned to take action. He prefaced ahead of time that if the storm does not come he would be most happy but his course of action was in the best interest of the city and the people in it.

Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York City took action.  Explained his actions, apologized if any one was inconvenient by his actions but took full responsibly for the path he set.

Was the city of New York prepared? Yes.

Was there loss of life? No.

Were there problems? Yes.

Was the city up and operating after the storm? Also yes.

The city of New York is not the United Sates of America, but the Mayor is a leader, businessman, a planner and lastly a politician. The criterion for success is simple: will it work? The method also simple: what is the likely outcome of my actions based on historical empirical results? Will the likelihood of a similar action bring the same or similar results? If so, act. If the event is unprecedented, what is the safest path? In the case of the hurricane: evacuate, shut down the transit system and prepare for recovery.

Our economy is in trouble, 10% of our workforce is unemployed and many more are under employed. The Government’s spending has no limits with results that are ineffective at best and foolish at worse. Actually foolish is far too polite- it is stupid.

If there is any history lesson for this problem, we don’t have to go far into history to resolve it. Under the Regan administration we had a serious recession. So what did Reagan do? He showed leadership focus and he knew that the success of the economy was based, not on the government’s spending, but the people’s group decision to change and act. In his case spend.

The economy is not a physical thing it is an emotional attitude.

Feeling good one can act in confidence. Feel scared, one acts with caution first then with fear. Fear does inspire one to be confident, hire new employees, and spend. Fear is by its nature is a retraction, a consolidation and if it continues for a protracted period of time, a withdrawal. The withdrawal is known in psychological circles as a depression. When people are depressed, they do desperate things.

We have now a remarkable series of events that painfully point down a road none of us want to travel. It started 10 years ago with the 9/11 terrorist attacks – our first point of fear. Our government created a dizzying array of measures to insure our fear in the good intension of improving security. We stepped up internal security, and created TSA, which unfortunately institutionalizes fear, de facto criminalization security procedures for all travelers. We put in a color coded warning system that took a color palette and induced fear in the application for yellow, orange and red. Interesting enough with the warning system directed any procedures or suggestions for modification of behavior. If yellow do what? If orange? If red? Do we as one great political stated buy duct taped?

On a personal level the duct tape was a clue of the true understanding of the problem. It seems the purchase of duct tape would in fact be good, if applied to the politicians’ mouth first, then as binding for them to a chair (if nothing else but to limit his wanton lust for self injury).  For Americans it would be a humanitarian gesture.

Next our government targeted organizations that no one other than themselves knew as the cause of all our troubles. Then it gave it a name that no one has ever seen and create a target of hate. Then with a stroke of genius, it declared war on it.

First our government found an enemy, educated us on the enemy so we can be convinced we have an enemy. They tell us the enemy is in Afghanistan, then Iraq, then Pakistan, then Somalia, then in any place that people are in States of dissatisfaction and lastly use non-peaceful means to target the dissatisfaction.

I wondered why are these people are unhappy with us? What did we do to them? And if we did something so terrible, why they would want to kill us? Our governments answer: they hate our way of life.

I find that a hard to swallow. I’m not fond of rap music and don’t particularly like country and western music, and I find most fast food atrocious say nothing of a means of slowly suicide, I dislike most holidays in that they have lost the meaning and have become overly commercial. That said I do not want to kill anyone over the offenses to my senses.

On the face of it there has to be more.

Anyway that is the governments line on al Qaida or however you spell it.

On closer examination, what does the government buy?  Planes, ships, consultants, government bonds and stuff to keep the government operating. What does consumers buy, food, cars, houses, furniture, carpets, books, computers, paper, tuition, and the list is endless.  Who creates the most jobs? Who should have the money?

I don’t care if you are a Republican or Democrat, given the track record of the government on spending, whom do you trust to make good decisions? My bet is on individuals.

Can we trust the government to make good decisions? Based on recent history? Based on record deficits? Based on results? The answer is indubitably and definitively, NO!

 

Our Elected Officials

We need to change our mandate for our public officials to make sure their interests are aligned will ours.

If we want better health care insurance: mandate that all public officials no matter what their rank or seniority have the same health insurance under the same financial terms as average private sector small business health insurance program.

If we want better service from our air carriers mandate that all public officials travel on public scheduled airlines.  If they need special privileges maybe they need different job that can afford those privileges.  Because we the people can not and should not have to pay that bill.

If we want better laws we have to mandate that our elected officials read every piece of legislation that they vote on.

If we want our public officials to be fiscally responsible, mandate that with each piece of spending legislation has noted a specific source of funding and an impact statement as to impact on the current and future budgets.  For every law there is a sunset legislation mandating the retirement of that law and renewal of such laws are subject to a vote on renewal.

If we want our publicly elected officials to commit us to a military action, there must be a stated goal, defined course of action and procedure for monitoring, policing and administrating the aftermath of that military operation, by an administrative agency to provide a comprehensive oversight.

If we want better policies we must demand that any law, programs, agency, administration be create with a specific purpose with periodic review of that purpose.  We need to avoid the migration of purpose to perpetuate the entity that is created to administer regulate or otherwise oversee such activity.  The government is not is the business of creating self perpetuating jobs.  A job must be purposeful.  Any sunset legislation of an agency etc will have as part of the task of closure the retraining, out-placing of its employees for its final task.  That stated goal will also have sunset restriction such that there is a fixed date with in 18 months closure of such agency.